<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Column Width: What is the One True Way?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Computer Programming</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rusinamunkki</title>
		<link>http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-24260</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusinamunkki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-24260</guid>
		<description>Well, I personally use 80 max chars (minus line numbers in VIM). At least 80 char works everywhere, and too long lines are just much harder to read. Shorter lines are better and much more readiable than long lines. So, 80 is my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I personally use 80 max chars (minus line numbers in VIM). At least 80 char works everywhere, and too long lines are just much harder to read. Shorter lines are better and much more readiable than long lines. So, 80 is my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didi</title>
		<link>http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-6404</link>
		<dc:creator>Didi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-6404</guid>
		<description>If you wanna anothers to colaborate with you, 80 columns is the holy way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you wanna anothers to colaborate with you, 80 columns is the holy way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinier Zwitserloot</title>
		<link>http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-4020</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinier Zwitserloot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-4020</guid>
		<description>Whuh? auto-format.

What I want is a source code repository system that is smart enough to just plain not bother with changes that have no effect at all on the Abstract Syntax Tree representation of the code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whuh? auto-format.</p>
<p>What I want is a source code repository system that is smart enough to just plain not bother with changes that have no effect at all on the Abstract Syntax Tree representation of the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Allen</title>
		<link>http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-4018</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluebones.net/2006/12/column-width-what-is-the-one-true-way/#comment-4018</guid>
		<description>I would like to see IDE's being smarter about how they wrap code. The alternative, losing over half my screen because one person on the team is using 80-column vi, really sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see IDE&#8217;s being smarter about how they wrap code. The alternative, losing over half my screen because one person on the team is using 80-column vi, really sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
